Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Sanjay K Agrawal, J
Geeta Bai – Appellant
Versus
Ramavtar Agrawal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. both appeals involve similar issues regarding the declaration of ownership from registered gift deeds. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. appellants raised defenses against the gift deeds but failed to substantiate their claims. (Para 5 , 6 , 18) |
| 3. the essence of valid gifts includes the acceptance by the donee, and unilateral cancellations are invalid. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. the court maintains the validity of the original gift deeds and dismisses the appeals. (Para 25 , 26) |
1. Both the appeals are being heard together as similar facts and issues are involved except the parties to the suit. The appeals are by the defendant.
2. Facts of F.A. No.186 of 2013 (Geeta Bai v. Ramavtar Agrawal)
This is an appeal arising out of the judgment and decree dated 2nd September, 2013 by the VI Addl. District Judge, Bilaspur, in Civil Suit No.13-A of 2012. The respondent Ramavatar Agrawal filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction against Smt. Geeta Bai. The pleadings, as made by the plaintiff are that defendant Geeta Bai is real maternal aunt (Sagi Mousi). Initially the financial position of the plaintiff was not good when he shifted from Katni to Bilaspur in 1975, therefore, out of lo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
