SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
GOUTAM BHADURI, J
Sanjay Mishra v. State of Chhattisgarh


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Abhishek Sinha
For the Respondents: Mr. F.S. Khare

Table of Content
1. review of bailable warrant issuance against a petitioner. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments concerning lack of evidence and jurisdiction. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's observations on magistrate's authority and procedure. (Para 6 , 8 , 12 , 14)
4. precedents on the lack of review authority for interlocutory orders. (Para 10 , 11)
5. final ruling on the legality of the impugned order. (Para 13 , 15)

1. The petitioner herein takes exception to order dated 10/11/2022 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kharsia in Complaint Case No. 125/2022 by which bailable warrant has been issued against him for offence punishable under S.420, S.467, S.468, S.471, S.465 read with S.34 of the IPC.

2. The aforesaid challenge has been made on the following factual backdrop i) Respondent No. 2 / complainant moved an application under S.200 of CrPC along with an application under S.156(3) of CrPC in which learned Magistrate recorded the statements of respondent No. 2 / complainant and his son Dev Singh Yadav and vide order dated 12/10/2022, he took cognizance of above - stated offences against Accused No. 1 - Setram Kapileshwar Patel, Accused No. 2 - J.S.W. Ispat Special Product Ltd. an
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top