Back
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Rakesh Mohan Pandey, J.
Sukhram Nishad v. State of Chhattisgarh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishing facts of the case involves examining allegations of harassment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented about the sufficiency of evidence for charge under ipc. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. judicial observations on the need for stringent evaluation of evidence for abetment. (Para 6 , 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. clarifications of the legal requirements for instigation and mens rea in abetment. (Para 9 , 13) |
| 5. final ruling on quashing the charge based on absence of credible evidence. (Para 15) |
1. This criminal revision has been preferred under S.397 read with S.401 of Cr.P.C. against the order dated 05.10.2021 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C.), District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) in Sessions Trial No.46/2021, whereby charge for the offence punishable under S.306 of IPC has been framed against the applicant herein.
2. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that on 15.11.2018 at about 04:00 PM, the deceased namely Lata Bai Nishad, committed suicide by hanging herself in a room. During the course of investigation, it has been stated by mother of the deceased that the present applicant used to harass her, therefore, the deceased committed suicide. On such complaint, the poli
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
