Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Parth Prateem Sahu, J
Satyam Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claims regarding recruitment process. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments reflecting legality of selection process. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. requirement of document legitimacy in candidate selection. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. court's analysis on recruitment rules and arbitrariness. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. court orders regarding petitioner's consideration for the post. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
Order on Board
31/01/2026
1. Notices were issued to private respondent no.4, petitioner had submitted the dasti service report along with affidavit, however there is no representation on behalf of respondent no. 4, therefore, this writ petition is considered and heard in his absence.
2. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:-
“10.1 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned action of the respondent authorities
10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider the candidature of the petitioner for the post of Secretary (Contractual) Tatapani Micro Watershed Committee (Code 2A6C6A2F).
10.3 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to restor
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
