SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 2826

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Parth Prateem Sahu, J
Satyam Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
WPS No. 10253 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Shrikant Kaushik
For the Respondents: Mr. Mayur Khandelwal

The recruitment process must adhere strictly to the stipulated criteria, ensuring equal opportunity and non-arbitrariness in selections for public appointments.

Headnote:(A) Recruitment Process - Article 14 of Constitution of India - Selection under the advertisement must adhere strictly to stipulated criteria - Experience certificate not mandated to be from Government or semi-Government institutions - The selection of respondent not based on merit list is arbitrary and illegal. (Paras 14-17)

(B) Public Employment - Equal opportunity must be provided for selection without arbitrary deviation from established procedures - Recruitment process must be transparent and non-discriminatory. (Paras 14-15)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to quash the withdrawal of his name from the merit list for Secretary position in a local committee, claiming that he was initially listed first based on merits and experience which should count towards selection. After his name was removed, another candidate was selected without basis in the merit list.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the selection of the private respondent was arbitrary, and directed the authorities to reinstate the petitioner’s original placement in the merit list.

Issues: The court primarily addressed whether the withdrawal of the petitioner’s name from the merit list and the selection of another candidate were done in accordance with the stipulated recruitment process.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the rules pertaining to recruitment must be followed strictly and that the experience requirement does not specify the source of the experience. The arbitrary selection processes leading to the appointment of a candidate not in accordance with the earlier merit list cannot be permitted.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's claims regarding recruitment process. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments reflecting legality of selection process. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. requirement of document legitimacy in candidate selection. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. court's analysis on recruitment rules and arbitrariness. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
5. court orders regarding petitioner's consideration for the post. (Para 17 , 18 , 19)

Order on Board

31/01/2026

1. Notices were issued to private respondent no.4, petitioner had submitted the dasti service report along with affidavit, however there is no representation on behalf of respondent no. 4, therefore, this writ petition is considered and heard in his absence.

2. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:-

“10.1 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned action of the respondent authorities

10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider the candidature of the petitioner for the post of Secretary (Contractual) Tatapani Micro Watershed Committee (Code 2A6C6A2F).

10.3 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to restore the name of the petitioner in the final merit list and to appoint/engage the petitioner on the post of advertised.

10.4 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction commanding the respondents to produce before this Hon’ble Court the entire records of the recruitment/selection process conducted under the aforesaid advertisement and to justify the deletion of the petitioner’s name from the merit list, failing which an adverse inference may kindly be drawn against the respondents.

10.5 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief/relief’s in favour of the petitioner, which the Hon’ble Court deemed fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case, including awarding of the costs of the petitioner."

3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the office of Deputy Director Agriculture cum Project Manager, WCDC, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh has issued an advertisement dated

06.03.2023 inviting application from the interested persons for their appointment to the post of Secretary (contractual) in various Micro Watershed Committee. Petitioner submitted an application for his appointment on the post of Secretary of Micro Watershed Committee, Tatapani which includes Tatapani, Teterdih, Navadih, Damodarpur, Dhangawan, Bhawanipur, Rajbandha and Lurghutta. There was only one post which is unreserved. Petitioner submitted an application along with other candidates and after receipt of application respondent departments have published list mentioning the name of candidates whose applications were received in the office. Respondent authorities thereafter has published merit list. Name and code with respect to Micro Watershed Committee, Tatapani list of three meritorious candidates was published in which petitioner has been shown to be at serial no. 1 in the merit list with 67.9 total marks in aggregate including the marks of experience. He submits that thereafter respondents have published a notice asking the candidates whose name is mentioned in the list published by the committee to produce documents for its verification. Accordingly, petitioner submitted all the relevant documents including experience certificate issued by the Mirror Academy Computer Education Centre, Ramanujganj with his appointment order and experience certificate.

4. He also submits that Deputy director further issued another letter on

11.12.2024 asking for submitting the documents once again to which petitioner also submitted. After lapse of about three months respondent had issued a notice mentioning that the appointment with respect to Micro Watershed Committee, Tatapani and Committee Jamvantpur is kept under consideration and select list with waiting list has been published for other committees as mentio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top