Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J
Parmeshwar Prasad Jaiswal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. core grievance regarding pension entitlement. (Para 1 , 4 , 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. commonality of issues across multiple writ petitions. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. pension eligibility complexities and policy gaps. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 12) |
| 4. judicial limitations on policy-making in pension matters. (Para 26 , 39 , 42) |
| 5. judicial review of executive pension policies. (Para 28 , 30 , 34) |
| 6. order for state to clarify policy on pension eligibility. (Para 46) |
1. Heard Mr. Anup Majumdar, Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Mr. C.J.K. Rao, Mr. Ishan Verma, Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Pandey, Mr. Vijay Shankar Mishra, Mr. Pankaj Kamlesh holding brief of Mr. Akath Kumar Yadav, Mr. Ravish Verma as well as Ms. Monika Thakur, learned counsel for the respective petitioners. Also heard Mr. Anand Dadariya, learned Deputy Advocate General, appearing for the State as well as Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta and Ms. Mamta Gendle holding brief of Mr. H.S. Ahluwalia, learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents.
2. Since a common question of law and facts arises for consideration in all these writ petitions, the same were clubbed together, heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common order, so as to avoid repetition of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
