SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 8816

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ, Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J
Indrapal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
CRA No. 57 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellant: Smita Jha
For the Respondent/State: Nitansh Jaiswal

When a fatal injury is inflicted without premeditation, in a sudden fight and in the heat of passion, without the assailant taking undue advantage or acting cruelly, the offence falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, constituting culpable homicide not amounting to murder punishable under Section 304 Part I IPC.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302 and 304 Part I - Exception 4 to Section 300 - Culpable homicide not amounting to murder - The appellant was convicted under Section 302 IPC for causing the death of a 4-year-old child by striking him on the head with an iron crowbar during a sudden quarrel with the child's father. The court found that the incident occurred without premeditation, in a sudden fight, and in the heat of passion, and that the appellant had not taken undue advantage or acted in a cruel or unusual manner, thus attracting Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC. The conviction was altered to Section 304 Part I IPC and the sentence reduced to 7 years' rigorous imprisonment. (Paras 19-29)

Facts of the case:
On 18.09.2020, the appellant, armed with an iron crowbar, attempted to assault Anand Singh due to prior enmity. When Anand Singh fled, the appellant struck Anand Singh's 4-year-old son Manish on the head, causing his death. The appellant was convicted under Section 302 IPC by the trial court.

Findings of Court:
The conviction under Section 302 IPC was set aside and altered to Section 304 Part I IPC, and the appellant was sentenced to 7 years' rigorous imprisonment.

Issues: Whether the case falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, thus constituting culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that since the act was committed without premeditation, in a sudden fight, and in the heat of passion, without the appellant having taken undue advantage or acted in a cruel or unusual manner, the case fell within Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, warranting conviction under Section 304 Part I IPC.

Result: Appeal partly allowed; conviction altered to Section 304 Part I IPC and sentence reduced to 7 years' rigorous imprisonment.

Table of Content
1. introduction of appeal and trial court conviction details. (Para 1)
2. prosecution case: facts, investigation, and evidence collection. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. trial court proceedings and conviction. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. arguments of appellant and state. (Para 8 , 9)
5. court's finding on homicidal death and medical evidence. (Para 10 , 11)
6. credibility of eyewitness pw-2. (Para 12 , 13)
7. evaluation of eyewitness pw-1. (Para 14)
8. corroboration by other eyewitnesses and overall reliability. (Para 15 , 16)
9. seizure of weapon and forensic evidence corroborating ocular testimony. (Para 17 , 18)
10. legal principles on exception 4 to section 300 ipc. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
11. application of exception 4 to facts: premeditation absent, sudden quarrel, heat of passion, conviction altered to section 304 part i. (Para 26 , 27 , 28)
12. final verdict: conviction under section 304 part i, sentence of 7 years, and directions. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)

(Cause title taken from Case Information System)

Judgement on Board

Per Ramesh Sinha, C.J.

13/04/2026

1. This is a criminal appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by the appellant against the impugned judgment of conviction and sentence dated 21.08.2023 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chirimiri, District Koria in Sessions Case No. 63 of 2020, whereby the learned trial Court has convicted and sentenced the appellant in the following manner:-

Conviction Sentence
U/s. 302 of IPC Life imprisonment and fine of Rs.1000/-, in default of payment of fine additional R.I. for one month.

2. The brief facts of the case are that on 18.09.2020 at about 4:00 PM, when the deceased Manish Singh (aged 4 years) was walking with his father Anand Singh (PW-2) near the house of Ajay Singh at Village Katkona, at that time, the appellant Indrapal Singh came out of his house armed with an iron crowbar (sabbal) and attempted to assault Anand Singh due to previous enmity. When the complainant, Anand Singh, fled to save his life, the appellant struck the minor child Manish on his head with the iron crowbar (sabbal). The injured child was immediately taken to the Community Health Centre, Khadgagawa, where he was declared dead. The death intimation was sent by the doctor to the police on the same day, where merg intimation (Exhibit P-01) was recorded. The said merg intimation was sent to Police Station Khadgagawa, where a numbered FIR (Exhibit P-02) was subsequently registered against the accused for the offence under Section 302 of IPC.

3. The inquest (Exhibit P-03) was prepared by the police in the presence of witnesses, and the dead body was sent for postmortem examination to the Community Health Centre, Khadgagawa, where PW-10 Dr. Manish Pratap Singh conducted the postmortem and gave his report (Exhibit P-11). During the postmortem, the doctor noticed one major lacerated wound on the frontal region of the head along with multiple contusions. On opening the scalp, hematoma was found on the frontal and parietal regions, and a fracture was present on the frontal bone of the skull. Extradural hematoma was also present. The doctor opined that the cause of death was shock due to fracture of skull bone and excessive hemorrhage. The death was homicidal in nature.

4. Spot map (Exhibit P-04) was prepared. The appellant was arrested on 21.09.2020, and his memorandum statement (Exhibit P-05) was recorded, pursuant to which one iron crowbar (sabbal) was seized vide seizure memo (Exhibit P-06). The seized weapon was sent for FSL examination, and as per the report (Exhibit P-18), human blood was found on it. Statements of witnesses under Section 161 Cr.P.C. were recorded. After completion of the investigation, charge-sheet was filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, who committed the case to the Court of Sessions, from where it was transferred to the learned trial Court for its trial.

5. The learne

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top