SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 9061

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SHATRUHAN @ MANU DHAHARE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
CRA/1999/2022



2026:CGHC:16587-DB Digitally signed by SAGRIKA SAGRIKA AGRAWAL AGRAWAL Date:

2026.04.17

14:32:59 +0530 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No. 1999 of 2022 Shatruhan @ Manu Dhahare S/o Budharulal Aged About 27 Years R/o Village-Sakroud, Police Station Rancharai, District Balod (C.G.)

... appellant(s)

versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Rancharai, Distt.-Balod (C.G.)

... Respondent(s)

For appellant(s) : Mr. Anupam Dubey, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sourabh Sahu, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice

10.04.2026 Heard Mr. Anupam Dubey, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. Sourabh Sahu, Panel Lawyer for the Respondent/ State.

1. The present appeal under Section 374 (2) of CrPC has been filed by the appellant against the impugned judgment of conviction and sentence dated 09.09.2022 passed by learned First Additional Sessions Judge, Balod (CG) in Sessions Case No. 36/2020, whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced in the following manner:-

S. No. Conviction Sentence

1. Under Section 302 of R.I. for life with fine of Rs. 1000/- in IPC default of payment of fine, further R.I.

for 01 month.

2. Under Section 324 of R.I. for 3 years with fine of Rs. 1000/-

IPC (two counts) in default of payment of fine, further R.I. for 01 month (two times).

2. Brief facts of the case are that the on 02.01.2020, the complainant Khileshwar Prasad Sahu (PW/1) was chatting with other witnesses and the deceased Lalit Thakur at Bhatapara Chowk. At about 12.50 hours, the appellant came there, armed with axe and all of sudden, he gave the axe blow on the right temporal region of the deceased Lalit Thakur. When Khileshwar Prasad Sahu (PW/1) and Sukhchand @ Bhola (PW/2) tried to intervene, he also assaulted them by axe. The injured Khileshwar Prasad Sahu lodged report to the Police on which Dehatinalashi (Ex-P/1) was recorded by the Police for the offence under Section 302 and 307 of IPC. Inquest of the dead body of the deceased (Ex-P/16) was prepared in presence of the witnesses. The dead body was sent for its post-mortem to Community Health Centre, Gunderdehi where Dr. Ajay Pal Chandrakar (PW/10) conducted the post-mortem of the dead body of the deceased and gave his report (Ex-P/11). While conducting the post-mortem, the doctor noticed incised wound on right side of face/ neck region and opined that the cause of death is Cardio-respiratory arrest due to hemorrhagic shock as a result of excessive bleeding from a cut of major vessel of neck, the nature of the injuries is antemortem and mode of death is homicidal. The injured persons Sukhchand @ Bhola and Khileshwar Prasad Sahu were also sent for their medical examination to Community Health Centre, Gunderdehi, where they have also been medically examined by (PW/10) Dr. Ajay Pal Chandrakar who gave their medical report (Ex-P/12 and P/13) and found injuries on their body which were simple in nature. Spot Map (Ex-P/2) was prepared by the Police and (Ex-P/22) was prepared by the Patwari. Blood stained and plain soil have been seized from the spot vide seizure memo (Ex- P/4). The appellant was arrested on 03.01.2020 and his memorandum statement (Ex-P/6) was recorded. Based on his memorandum statement, blood stained axe has been seized vide seizure memo (Ex- P/7). Blood stained jacket of the appellant has also been seized from him vide seizure memo (Ex- P/8). The seized articles were sent for its query report to the doctor, who gave his query report (Ex-P/14) and opined that the injuries found on the body of the deceased as well as injured persons could have been caused by the said axe. He referred the seized articles for chemical examination for confirmation of presence of blood. The blood stained and plain soil, axe and jacket seized from the appellant, Gamchha, shirt and lower of the deceased were sent for its chemical examination to State FSL, Raipur, from wer

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top