SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 10547

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
BALUD RAM SAHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPC/1827/2026



Digitally signed by SHAYNA 2026:CGHC:18534 KADRI NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1827 of 2026

1 - Balud Ram Sahu S/o Kartik Ram Sahu Aged About 66 Years R/o Village Jhumka, P.S. Sarsiwa District- Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.)

2 - Santosh Kumar Sahu S/o Balud Ram Sahu Aged About 37 Years R/o Village Jhumka, P.S. Sarsiwa District- Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.)

... Petitioner(s)

versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Capital Complex Atal Nagar, Raipur District- Raipur Chhattisgarh

2 - The Collector, District- Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.)

3 - Deputy Collector, District- Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.)

4 - The Sub Divisional Magistrate , Bilaigarh District- Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.)

5 - Tahsildar, Sarsiwa District- Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.)

6 - Revenue Inspector, Shri Vikas Kumar Sahu, Circle Sarsiwa District-

Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.)

7 - Patwari , Halka No. 09, Tahsil Sarsiwa District- Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.)

8 - Sdop, Shri Vijay Kumar Thakur, Thana Bilaigarh District- Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.)

9 - Sdop, Shri Manish Kumar Thana Sarangarh District- Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.)

10 - Kaushal Joshi S/o Late Kartikram Joshi Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Jhumka P.S. Sarsiwa , District- Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.)

11 - Radhadevi Joshi W/o Kaushal Joshi Aged About 47 Years R/o Village Jhumka P.S. Sarsiwa , District- Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.)

12 - Vishal Joshi S/o Kaushal Joshi R/o Village Jhumka P.S. Sarsiwa , District- Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.)

13 - Ronit Joshi S/o Kaushal Joshi Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Jhumka P.S. Sarsiwa , District- Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.)

... Respondent(s)

(Cause Title is taken from CIS System)

For Petitioner : Mr. J. K. Gupta, Advocate For State : Mr. Anadi Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Order on Board

23/04/2026

1. The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:

“10.1 That, petitioner most respectfully prays that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the proper demarcation/batankan of Khasra Nos. 246/2 and 253/3, Village Jhumka, strictly in accordance with law.

10.2 Quash and set aside the illegal investigation report submitted by the Patwari and Revenue Inspector dated 18.09.2024, 27.06.2025 & 11.11.2025 being arbitrary and illegal.

10.3 Issue a direction/order to the to register a First Information Report (FIR) against the private respondents and involved officials, and to ensure a time- bound, fair, and impartial investigation into the illegal and forcible cutting and removal of crops from the Petitioner's land.

10.4 Direct the respondent no. 10 to 13 to remove the blunt in the agricultural land.

10.5 Any other relief or reliefs that may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may be also kindly be granted.”

2. Facts of the case, as projected, are that the petitioners have approached this Court stating that the lands bearing Khasra Nos. 246, 252, 253, and 258 were not demarcated since the year 1927, and the first demarcation exercise was carried out only in the year 2023. According to the petitioners, such delayed demarcation has led to serious discrepancies and disputes regarding boundaries and possession. It is the case of the petitioners that Petitioner No. 1 had purchased agricultural land bearing Khasra No. 246/2 admeasuring 0.186 hectare through a registered sale deed dated

04.01.2008 and has been in continuous possession and cultivation of the said land since then. It is further contended that the petitioner had taken possession of approximately one acre of land, which included portions of Khasra Nos. 246 and 253. However, due to an alleged clerical or record-related error at the time of registration, the land was reflected in fragmented form, leading to confusion regarding its actual boundaries. The petitioners further submit that several adjoining landholders have also purchased lands from the same vendors over a period of time through different sale deeds, which has f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top