SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 17623

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Ramesh Sinha, CJ, Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J
Shesh Narayan Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
CRA No. 1541 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ravish Verma
For the Respondents: Shashank Thakur

The conviction for murder is reducible to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 4 of Section 300 IPC if the act was committed during a sudden quarrel, without premeditation, or cruelty. Additionally, conviction under the Atrocities Act requires strict proof of the victim's social status.

Headnote:(A) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 3(2)(v) - Conviction set aside due to failure to prove social status of the deceased according to law. (Para 33, 34)

(B) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 300, Exception 4 - Culpable homicide not amounting to murder - Sudden fight - Heat of passion - Lack of premeditation - Appellant did not act in a cruel or unusual manner - Conviction under Section 302 altered to Section 304 Part-I and Section 307 altered to Section 324. (Para 30, 32, 35)

Facts of the case:
An appeal was filed against the conviction and sentencing for murder and attempted murder. The appellant had an altercation over a money transaction with an injured witness and subsequently stabbed the deceased once in the abdomen. The prosecution alleged offences under the IPC, Arms Act, and the Atrocities Act.

Findings of Court:
The court held that the offence was committed during a sudden quarrel without premeditation and the appellant did not act in a cruel manner. The conviction for murder was reduced to culpable homicide not amounting to murder. The conviction under the Atrocities Act was set aside as the social status of the deceased was not proved. The conviction under Section 307 was downgraded to Section 324 as injuries were not proven to be grievous.

Issues: Whether the appellant’s case falls under Exception 4 of Section 300 IPC and whether the conviction under the Atrocities Act and Section 307 IPC was sustainable.

Ratio Decidendi: Exception 4 is applicable where there is a sudden fight, no premeditation, and the act is committed in the heat of passion without undue advantage or cruelty. Failure to formally prove the social status of the victim invalidates conviction under the Atrocities Act. Absence of medical evidence regarding the nature of injuries makes conviction under Section 307 untenable, whereas it constitutes hurt by a dangerous weapon under Section 324.

Result: Appeal partly allowed; convictions modified to Sections 304 Part-I and 324 of the IPC.

Table of Content
1. procedural history and factual foundation of the prosecution case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. summary of defense and prosecution contentions regarding conviction. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
3. evidence analysis concerning the commission of the crime. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
4. application of exception 4 to section 300 ipc for sudden fight. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
5. modification of charges and final sentencing assessment. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39)

Judgment on Board

Per Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.

1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 415 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 r/w 14A(1)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short, ‘SCST Act’), against the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 26.04.2017 passed by the learned Special Judge for SCST Act, Korba, District-Korba in Special Criminal Case-31 of 2020, whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced in the following manner with default stipulation, and to run the sentences concurrently:

Conviction Sentence
Under Section 302 of the IPC RI for life and to pay fine of Rs.25000/-
Under Section 307 of the IPC RI for 10 years and to pay fine of Rs.25,000/-
Under Section 3(2)(v) of the Prevention of Atrocities of Scheduled Tribe and Scheduled Caste Act, 1989 RI for life and to pay fine of Rs.25000/-

2. Brief facts of the case are that complainant- Laxmi Prasad Chouhan gave merg intimation to the Police Ex.P11 that on 05.09.2020 at about 3 p when he was in his house along with his family members, they heard noise of a person and when they came out from their house, they saw that the appellant was assaulting PW1-Uma Yadav. All of sudden, he came towards them and assaulted his wife Gauribai on her abdomen by knife and she fell down. Blood was oozing and her intestines came out from her body. When he intervened the incident, appellant fled away from the place. They took the injured- Gauribai to the hospital, where she died. Based on the merg intimation, Dehati First Information Ex.P12 was recorded by the Police, and then Police started investigation. Inquest of the dead-body of the deceased Ex.P24 was prepared in presence of the witnesses and the dead-body was sent for its postmortem to the District Hospital, Korba, where PW6-Dr Ram Kumar Divya conducted postmortem on the dead-body of deceased and gave his report Ex.P9. While conducting postmortem, the doctor has noticed 1)an abrasion over left side chest, 2)stab injury over left hypochondrium 5cm away from epigastrium region reaching to cut the both lobes of liver, lower surfaces of body of stomach, length of stab wound is 12”, and death of the deceased is homicidal in nature. Injured PW1- Uma Yadav was also sent for her treatment to the District Hospital, Korba, where PW6-Dr Ram Kumar Divya medically examined her and gave his report Ex.P7. Injured Uma Yadav received 1)incised wound over right forearm, 2)incised would over right arm, 3)incised would over right shoulder joint, 4)incised would over left mandible region, 5)incised would over left pinna, lower part and the doctor opined that injuries caused by hard and sharp object and she was referred for expert opinion from surgical specialist. Injured was admitted at the district hospital, Korba from 05.09.2020 to 08.09.2020, her bed ticket has been obtained vide Ex.A1. The dying declaration of injured-Gauribai Ex.P1, spot map Ex.P2 was prepared by Patwari, Ex.P13 was prepared by the Police. From the floor, and door of house of injured Uma Yadav, pieces of blood soaked cotton, and plain piece of cotton have been seized from the spot vide seizure memo Ex.P14. Blood spots wiped out with piece of cotton, and plain piece of cotton have been seized from the house of deceased-Gauribai vide Ex.P15. Blood spots from the auto have been wiped out with respect to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top