Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Raj Kumar Goyal, CJ
Akshay Kumar Malhotra – Appellant
Versus
CPIO Delhi Police, North West District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. rti query seeks information on fir status. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. appeal process after unsatisfactory initial response. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. commission hearing reveals flaws in earlier responses. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. contention on information provided not fulfilling criteria. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. judicial pronouncements highlight rti limits. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. misuse of rti can affect transparency. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. appeal dismissed without further intervention. (Para 18) |
ORDER
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 11.11.2024, before the CPIO, Delhi Police, North West District, seeking information as under:
“My RTI Application is related to information on action taken and status report on my Online FIR No. 80123380/2024 dated 25.10.2024 regarding cutting and Theft of stainless steel rods of exercise bars in Motey wala park shalimar bagh of Delhi Development Authority, Delhi-110088 I lodged Online FIR's of theft on very date of seeing the theft by me itself. So, this RTI is just to know the Status and action taken on my above mentioned theft FIR's.
Infact, the information asked by me through present RTI Application should have been made available to me suo-moto,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
