Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
P R Ramesh, Commissioner
Rajnish Ratnakar – Appellant
Versus
CPIO: Ministry of Women & Child Development – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. rti queries on appointments, public servant liability, and ipc violations not disclosable (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. anganwadi workers honorary; gratuity per state-specific sc directives (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. rti limited to existing records; no opinions or inferences required (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. rti misuse by repetitive filings warrants admonition and dismissal (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
ORDER
Second Appeal No. CIC/MOWCD/A/2024/635389
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 21.04.2024 seeking information on the following points:
1. Whether Ms Jyotika Has Been Appointed Pgo In My Public Grievance After Receiving Of My Two RTI Application, Bearing Registration Number Mowcd/R/E/23/01204 And Mowcd/R/E/23/01205 And Whether She Has Been Assigned Responciblity Of Faa In This Section Propr To Filing Of My Rti Application. Why Ms Arkaja Das Has Refused To Perform The Role Of Pgo In This Public Grievance And Who Have Appointed Ms Jyotika As Pgo In This Public Grievance.
2. Why Ms Aditi Das Rout Has Refused To Perform The Role Of First Appealate Authority In My Appeal And When Ms Pallavi Aggrawal Has Been Appointed First Appealate Authority In T
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
