SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 2292

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
SANJEEV KUMAR JINDAL, Information Commissioner
Shish Pal – Appellant
Versus
CPIO – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sakal Sikri

Information sought:

1. Second Appeal No. : CIC/MOCOP/A/2024/645143

The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 27.06.2024 seeking the following information:

The CPIO furnished a reply to the Appellant on 29.08.2024 stating as under:

Being dissatisfied, the appellant filed a First Appeal dated 03.09.2024. The FAA vide its order dated 08.10.2024 stated as under:

(1) The appellant Shri Shish Pal, a citizen of India and also a contractual employee of the Regional Institute of Cooperative Management, Chandigarh, a training institute of NCCT, has filed this first appeal vide the appeal dated 03.09.2024 under Section 19(1) of the RTI Act 2005 having been aggrieved of the reply/response of the CPIO, NCCT letter dated 29/08/2024 with regards to his RTI application dated 27- 06-2024.

(2) The facts in the matter have been examined from the records. It has been found that the appellant had earlier vide his first appeal dated 12.08.2024 to the undersigned being the First Appellant Authority under Section 19 of RTI Act stating his grievance about the non- receipt of reply from the CPIO as his RTI application dated 27.06.2024. While disposing off the said first appeal, the CPIO was directed to furnis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top