SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 30966

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
KAMLA MOHAN (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. – Appellant
Versus
DR. RAJNI PALRIWALA – Respondent


Advocates:
RAKESH KUMAR MITTAL

O R D E R

% 23.09.2024 CAV 475/2024

1. Since there is an appearance on behalf of the Respondent, the caveat stands discharged.

CM Appl.55756/2024[Exemption from filing certified and dim copies]

2. Allowed, subject to the Appellant filing certified and dim copies of the annexures within a period of four weeks.

3. The Application stands disposed of.

CM Appl.55757/2024[Exemption from filing Trial Court record]

4. Registry is directed to place on record the digital copy of the Trial Court Record duly paginated and book-marked in accordance with the rules of the High Court.

5. The Application stands disposed of.

CM Appl. unnumbered [Stay]

6. This is an Application filed on behalf of the Appellant seeking stay of the impugned judgment dated 01.08.2024.

7. Registry is directed to number the Application which is available at PDF page 266 of the case file.

8. The present Appeal has been filed on behalf of the Appellant impugning the judgment and decree dated 01.08.2024 [hereinafter referred to as “the Impugned Order”] passed by the learned District Judge-07, Central District, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi. By the Impugned Judgment, the suit for specific performance of agreement to sell dated 28.03.2003 (file

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top