Back
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, JJ
JOHNSON KA – Appellant
Versus
EVAAN HOLDINGS PVT LTD & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. company incorporated and allegations (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. investment and conversion of shares (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. nclt petition and findings (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. writ petition filed (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 5. appellant's submissions on maintainability (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 6. respondent's opposition to appeal (Para 29) |
| 7. court's review of rbi's actions (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68) |
| 8. court's reasoning on maintainability (Para 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75) |
| 9. dismissal of the appeal (Para 76 , 77 , 78) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The instant appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent has been filed on behalf of the appellants seeking the following reliefs: “a) Allow the present Appeal and set aside the Impugned Judgement dated 23.10.2024 passed by the Learned Single Judge in Writ Petition bearing W.P. (C) No. 9877 of 2024 titled as Evaan Holdings Pvt. Ltd. v. Reserve Bank of India & Ors. and dismiss the said Writ Petition for being non- maintainable and mala-fid
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
