SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 7703

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
DINESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI – Respondent


JUDGMENT

RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J.

1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No. 1/2023 registered under Section 30 Arms Act

1959 registered at Police Station IGI Airport.

2. In brief, the facts of the case are that the petitioner was travelling from Delhi to Kolkata by Air India Airlines, Flight number A1-762 on 31.12.2022 and during the security check, ammunitions like articles were detected in the baggage of the petitioner. While searching his baggage, three (03) ammunition shaped articles were recovered from the same. As a result, a complaint at Police Station IGI Airport was received on 01.01.2023 by complainant Ms. Dolly, Sr. Associate, DIAL Security and Vigilance, IGI Airport. On the basis of the said complaint, the FIR No. 01/2023 was registered against the petitioner.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State. I have also perused the status report filed by the State.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was completely unaware about the articles recovered from his baggage. It is furth

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top