SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Del) 31593

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
VIBHU BAKHRU, TARA VITASTA GANJU, JJ
BAUSCH AND LOMB INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
ASSESSMENT UNIT NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE DELHI – Respondent


VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (Oral)

1. The petitioner (hereafter the assessee) has filed the present petition impugning an assessment order dated 26.03.2024 (hereafter the impugned order) passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter the Act) in respect of the Assessment Year 2022-23 relevant to the Previous Year 2021-22. Although the assessee has an efficacious remedy of an appeal, the assessee seeks to pursue the present petition confining the challenge to the impugned order on the ground that the impugned order was passed in violation of the principles of natural justice.

2. The Assessing Officer has added a sum of ₹70,10,37,475/- (Rupees Seventy Crores Ten Lacs Thirty-seven Thousand Four Hundred Seventy-five Only) to the total income as declared by the assessee, as unexplained Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed expenditure under Section 69C of the Act. In addition, the Assessing Officer has also initiated penalty proceedings under Section 271AAC(1) of the Act for concealment of income. The controversy essentially relates to the declaration of the purchases made by the assessee during the Previous Year 2021-22. The assessee was called upon to s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top