Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV,J
Abhijit Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Wipro Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim for damages due to alleged defamation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. employment details and basis for claims. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. plaintiff's arguments on defamation. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. defendant's counterarguments against defamation claims. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. court's observations on employment contract terms. (Para 21 , 22 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 6. nature of the employment contract and termination rights. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 7. judicial principles on defamation and employment. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 8. elements of defamation and burden of proof. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60) |
| 9. court's analysis of defamatory remarks. (Para 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70) |
| 10. publication requirements in defamation cases. (Para 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80) |
| 11. foreseeability of publication in defamation. (Para 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90) |
| 12. court's conclusion on defamation and damages. (Para 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95) |
| 13. damages for defamation and their assessment. (Para 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102) |
| 1 |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
