IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
MRS. NISHRIN SAIFUDIN AKOLAWALA – Appellant
Versus
SAVITRI TELECOM SERVICES – Respondent
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
1. Aforesaid two Petitions under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 have been filed seeking quashing of the proceedings in CC No. 2052/2020 and Summoning Order dated 06.02.2020/09.03.2021 passed by then Ld. M.M. for offences under Section s 138 /141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 , against the Petitioners, Mrs. Nishrin Saifudin Akolawala and Mr. Juzer Bharmal.
CRL.M.C.3452/2021 & 161/2022 Page 2 of 11 Signature Not Verified Signed By:RITA
2. Briefly stated, the Complainant/ M/s Savitri Telecom Services is a registered Partnership Firm engaged in business of marketing, manufacturing, installing, renting and servicing instrument & accessories related to electrical, telecommunication, electronics, RF, fiber optics, networking, CATV, DATACOM, security, IT Industries.
3. Accused Company/ M/s Lookman Electroplast Industries Ltd. has been engaged by Bharat Electronics Limited for undertaking work for Agra Smart City Ltd. for setting up Command & Control Center and City surveillance work, for which the accused persons were required to import software component of integrated command and control centre from Qognify Limited (Israeli Company). However, the A
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.