Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
AMIT BANSAL, J
TRISHLA CHATURVEDI – Appellant
Versus
UMANG TANEJA & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. defamation suit filed seeking injunction. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 2. claims against videos degrading the plaintiff. (Para 19 , 22) |
| 3. court recognizes potential irreparable harm. (Para 21 , 23) |
| 4. immediate removal of defamatory content ordered. (Para 24 , 26) |
O R D E R
% 04.09.2025 I.A. 21899/2025 (seeking exemption from filing clear/legible/translated documents)
1. Allowed, subject the plaintiff filing legible copies of documents within four (4) weeks from today.
2. The application stands disposed of. I.A. 21900/2025 (u/S 149 of CPC, 1908)
3. Ms. Swathi Sukumar, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff submits that the requisite court fees shall be paid within one (1)
week from today.
4. The statement of the counsel is taken on record.
CS(OS) 613/2025 Page 1 of 6
5. The application stands disposed of.
CS(OS) 613/2025
6. Let the plaint be registered as a suit.
7. Issue summons.
8. Summons are accepted by counsel appearing for the defendant no.2, who waives the issuance of formal summons.
9. Summons be issued to the defendants no. 1 and 3 through all permissible modes.
10. The summons shall state that the written statement(s) shall be filed by the defendants within thirty (30) d
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
