Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
SHIV KHANNA – Appellant
Versus
ARUN KHANNA & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts regarding the background and context of the property dispute. (Para 6 , 12) |
| 2. arguments addressing the trial court's handling of the lawsuit. (Para 8 , 10) |
| 3. court's criteria for assessing vexatious claims under civil procedure. (Para 9 , 11 , 14) |
| 4. court's ruling on the remand and reassessment of the trial court's decision. (Para 15 , 17) |
| 5. final conclusion of the appeal. (Para 20) |
O R D E R
% 01.09.2025 The court has heard Mr. Shohit Chaudhary, learned counsel appearing for the appellant; as well as Mr. Ashwin Vaish, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2, at length.
2. All respondents have been duly served.
3. Respondent No.1 has joined (in-person) via video-conferencing.
4. No one is present on behalf of respondents Nos. 3 and 4.
5. However, in view of the order that this court proposes to pass, it is not considered necessary to await the presence of respondents Nos.
3 and 4.
6. By way of the present appeal filed under section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (‘CPC’), the appellant (plaintiff) impugns order RFA147/2020 Page1of dated 31.10.2019, by which the plaint filed by the appellant seeking partition of property bearing Plot No. 39 on Road No
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
