Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RENU BHATNAGAR, J
PRITI SARAF – Appellant
Versus
AJAY SHARMA & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdictional overview and context of appeal. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. rights of parties in eviction proceedings. (Para 5) |
| 3. legal precedents supporting spouse eviction contestations. (Para 10 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. right to reside in shared household. (Para 11) |
| 5. rights of the wife in eviction proceedings. (Para 12 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. legal recourse for spouses regarding eviction. (Para 16 , 18) |
| 7. issues of collusion and rights enforcement. (Para 25) |
| 8. clarification of landlord-tenant rights versus spousal claims. (Para 26 , 28) |
| 9. final directions regarding appeal and compliance. (Para 41 , 42) |
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
RFA 868/2025 & CM APPL. 58060/2025 (stay)
2. The present regular first appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as, ‘CPC’) has been filed by the appellant against the Final Judgment and Decree dated 26.04.2025 (hereinafter referred to as, ‘Impugned Judgment’) and Order dated 29.03.2025 passed by the learned District Judge, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, in CS 4285/2024 titled Ajay Sharma v. M/s Asian Hotels (East) and Anr.
3. Vide Order dated 29.03.2025, the application preferr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
