Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
LAXMI JHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. legal basis for challenging summoning order. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding instigation and evidence against petitioners. (Para 5 , 7 , 12) |
| 3. assessment of evidence regarding abetment to suicide disclaimed. (Para 15 , 22 , 36) |
| 4. clarification of requirements for abetment of suicide. (Para 20 , 24) |
| 5. lack of evidence linking petitioners to the act of instigation. (Para 28 , 30 , 32) |
2. The FIR was registered at the instance of the complainant, namely– Vijay K Jha, who is the father of the deceased. The marriage between the deceased (husband of Petitioner No. 1) and Petitioner No. 1 was solemnised on 05.06.2002. It is alleged that the deceased committed suicide on 14.09.2002, due to continuous harassment at the hands of Petitioner No. 1 and her family members. He left behind a suicide note, wherein he has named the petitioners and has written that they lodged a false complaint against him in CAW Cell and also threatened to beat him and falsely implicate him and his family members in frivolous cases with the help of Police officers and politicians who are well-acquainted with them.
3. After completion of investigation, a cancellation report was filed by the Invest
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
