Table of Content
1. conviction for robbery established through prompt arrest and recovery. (Para 1 , 2)
2. defendant's arguments about evidence reliability and missing witnesses discussed. (Para 3 , 4)
3. witness testimonies support prosecution's case. (Para 5 , 6 , 8)
4. court affirmed prosecution value despite absence of independent witnesses. (Para 7 , 9)

The appellant was convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 392 /397/411 IPC and sentenced as under:

“(a) Convict Afzal is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years offence punishable 392 IPC and to pay fine of Rs.1000/-. In default of payment of fine, convict shall undergo simple imprisonment for one month.

(b) Convict Afzal is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years for the offence punishable 397 IPC.

(c) Convict Afzal is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year for the offence punishable 411 IPC and to pay fine of Rs.500/-. In default of payment of fine, convict shall undergo SI for 1 month.

(d) Sentences and default sentences to run concurrently.

(e) Benefit of section 428 Cr.P.C is extended to the convict.”

2. The facts in a nutshell, as per the case of the prosecution, ar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document