DELHI HIGH COURT
, J
Harinder Mohan Dass v. General Manager Northern Railway Baroda House New Delhi
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners are challenging promotional orders. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claims of mala fides were not substantiated. (Para 8 , 11) |
| 3. panel inclusion does not guarantee a right to promotion. (Para 12 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. the procedural authority of the railway board is upheld. (Para 16 , 19) |
| 5. court dismisses the petitions. (Para 21) |
1. These are connected writ petitions under Art.226 of the Constitution. They raise common questions of law and fact. Hence they can be considered in a common judgment.
2. In these petitions, the petitioners who are serving as Enquiry Cum Reservation Clerks in the Northern Railway, seek the following reliefs:
(1) a writ of mandamus to respondent No. 1 (General Manager, Northern Railway) requiring him to withdraw his order dated November 3, 1965, (order No. 754E / 20 - II (Trip) (EIC) and to restore the names of the petitioners on the panel as shown in Annexure 'E' to the petition and to make promotions on the basis of that panel;
(2) a writ of mandamus to Respondent No. 2 (Railway Board) to withdraw its direction and orders to Respondent No. 1 to partially cancel the panel shown at Annexure 'E' to the petition and
(3) for consequential reliefs.
3. The Railw
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.