SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6

DELHI HIGH COURT
, J
Raj Rani Bhasin and Others v. S. Kartar Singh Mehta


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: [Counsel Name]
For the Respondents: [Counsel Name]

1. The decision of this appeal turns on the determination of the question whether the plaintiff - respondent was ready and willing to purchase the property from the defendants - appellants from the date of the contract between the parties till the date of the filing suit for specific performance by the plaintiff - respondent against the defendants - appellants.

2. The suit for specific performance filed by the plaintiff - respondent against the defendants - appellants has been decreed by the trial Court. Hence this appeal by the defendants - appellants. The facts and circumstances on which the decision in the appeal would be arrived at may be shortly stated.

3. The ground floor portion of the building in suit was leased by the defendants - appellants to the plaintiff - respondent in 1958. On 21-09-1961, the defendants - appellants agreed to sell the building in suit to the plaintiff respondent. The conveyance of the property, however, did not take place and a fresh agreement to sell was executed by the defendants - appellants in favour of the plaintiff - respondent on 20-03-1962. The material clauses of the agreement to sell were as follows: -
(2) The sellers were to pay off the mort





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top