Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
, J
Raj Rani Bhasin and Others v. S. Kartar Singh Mehta
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court examines readiness and willingness for contract performance. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of contractual obligations and timelines. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. financial capacity doesn't equate to willingness to perform. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. specific performance requires plaintiff's unequivocal willingness. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. dismissal of suit due to lack of necessary compliance by plaintiff. (Para 16) |
1. The decision of this appeal turns on the determination of the question whether the plaintiff - respondent was ready and willing to purchase the property from the defendants - appellants from the date of the contract between the parties till the date of the filing suit for specific performance by the plaintiff - respondent against the defendants - appellants.
2. The suit for specific performance filed by the plaintiff - respondent against the defendants - appellants has been decreed by the trial Court. Hence this appeal by the defendants - appellants. The facts and circumstances on which the decision in the appeal would be arrived at may be shortly stated.
3. The ground floor portion of the building in suit was leased by the defendants - appellants to the plaintiff - respon
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
