DELHI HIGH COURT
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J
Taj Singh v. State (Delhi Admn.)
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's bail application summary. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. legal premise regarding completion of investigation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. clarification on investigation terms and requirements. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. defense arguments on police report completeness. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. conclusion on bail application and police report validity. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
1. In this application for the grant of bail for the petitioner Taj Singh in case FIR No. 196/86 under S.307/302/34 IPC and S.25/54/59 Arms Act of Police Station Narela the short question which calls for determination is as to whether investigation of the case would be said to be complete in terms of S. 173(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short the Code), when the Investigating Officer submitted the challan before the Magistrate on 27-1-87 (the 90th day in terms of the proviso (a)(i) to sub-sec. (2) of S. 167 of the Code) without appending thereto the report of the Central Forensic Science Laboratory, New Delhi (hereinafter to be referred to as CFSL) which report has been made admissible in evidence under S. 293 of the Code without the same being proved in the ordinary manner by the deposition of the expert making th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.