SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Online)(Del) 3

DELHI HIGH COURT
S. Muralidhar, J
Trustees of Safdar Hashmi Memorial Trust v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
Writ Petition No. 1234 of 1993



Advocates:
For the Petitioner:[Petitioner's Advocate Name]
For the Respondent:[Respondent's Advocate Name]

The court ruled that notification for forfeiture of material without stating clear grounds is invalid, violating principles of natural justice and freedom of expression.

Headnote:(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 95 and 96 - Forfeiture of objectionable material - Notification issued by the Government of NCT of Delhi declared posters promoting disharmony between communities forfeited due to malicious intent - Petition challenged the notification on grounds of vagueness and non-application of mind. The court held that mandatory conditions of stating grounds for the opinion were not met and the notification failed legal scrutiny - Resulting in setting aside the notification. (Paras 1 to 18)

(B) Constitutional Rights - Article 19(1)(a) - Freedom of speech and expression is paramount, with any infringement requiring strict adherence to legal provisions. The court emphasized that notification should specify offending material and the community it allegedly hurts to maintain legality. (Paras 3, 4, 10, 18)

Table of Content
1. challenge to forfeiture notification highlights vagueness. (Para 1 , 2)
2. issues raised against the clarity and legality of the notification. (Para 3 , 4)
3. importance of stating specific grounds for government opinions. (Para 5 , 6 , 8)
4. lack of malicious intent in the issuance of the notification. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. court's ruling on the invalidity of the notification. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)

1.By this petition under S. 96 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the Code), Notification No. F.24/85 Misc.93 - PO : dated 21-8-1993 passed by the Government of NCT of Delhi, purported to have been issued under S. 95 of the Code is under challenge. By the notification in question posters entitled : Ram Katha in Budhist tradition and Jain tradition displayed in the banner of the Safdar Hashmi memorial Trust alias Sahmat were held to have been published, circulated and displayed with deliberate and malicious intention to insult or attempt to insult religious belief of a particular community and also that these posters promote or attempt to promote on the ground of religion, disharmony or feeling of enmity between different religions / communities which act is an offence punishable under S.153 - A and S. 295 - A of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 (in short the IPC). In exercise of powers conferred under S. 95 (1) of the Code read with Notification No. U - 11011/2/74 / UTL (i) dated 20-3-74, the Government of NCT of Delhi has declared every copy of the aforesaid posters and material containing the above - said objectionable materials forfeited to the Government.
The notification was issued in the background of the Ayodhaya controversy. A national workshop was held on 11th July, 1993 and the programme Intended for 15th August, 1993 was given a concrete shape under the title of the "Mukt Naad" i.e. 'Free Expression'. The programme was to be held at Ram Ki Pairi on the banks of the Saryu River in Ayodhya. It was intended to Include social workers, artists, intellectuals and citizens at which musicians, performers and artists were to come together to celebrate the social integrity of India and the togetherness of all persons regardless of their religious faith. "The programme was also to include an exhibition, A tribute to Ayodhya, to demonstrate its diversity and social and cultural significance over the ages. This exhibition was to be held at 17 places all over the country and was to be organised by the local people from 9th to 14th August, 1993. These locations among others were Delhi, Bombay,Calcutta, Bangalore, Patna, Simla, Amritsar, Chandigarh, Jallandhar, Ranchi, Bhopal, Lucknow, Jaipur, Benaras, Faizabad, Baroda and Hyderabad. In the exhibition, 83 panels consisting of paintings, photographs, reproduction of archeological material, persons, buildings and various texts etc. were displayed. One of these panels was titled "Ram Katha". It consisted of four pages of text on A - 4 size paper. It was divided into six sections. Included in these six sections were two posters to which the present petition relates, that is Ram Katha in Buddhist Tradition and Ram Katha in Jain Tradition. However, some parts of the poster appears to have attracted notice of the authorities and impugned notification has been issued. The same is reproduced below :
"No. F.24/85 / Misc, 93 - PO.-- Whereas it appears to the Lieutenant Governor of the National Capital Territory of Delhi that the posters entitled Ram Katha in Bhudist Traditionand Ram Katha in Jain Tradition have with deliberate and malicious intention been published, circulated and displayed by "Sahmat" to insult or attempt to insult the religious belief of a particular community and these posters also promote or attempt to promote on the ground of religious belief of a particular community and these posters also promote or attempt to promote on the ground of religion disharmony or feeling of enmity between different religious communities which act is an offenc






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top