P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR, A.K.SARKAR, K.C.DAS GUPTA, K.N.WANCHOO, N.RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR
Harnam Das – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
Judgment
SARKAR, J. : The only question that was argued in this appeal is substantially one of construction of S.99-D of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
2. The appellant was the author of two books in Hindi called Sikh Mat Khandan Part 1 and Bhoomika Nazam Sikh Mat Khandan which he has published in April 1953. On July 30, 1953, the Government of Uttar Pradesh, the respondent in this appeal, made an order under S. 99-A of that Code forfeiting these books which were thereupon seized and taken away. That order, so far as material, was in the following terms:
"In exercise of its powers conferred by section 99-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure ......... the Government is pleased to declare the books ......forfeited to Government on the ground that the said book contain matter, the publication of which is punishable under sections 153-A and 295-A of the Indian Penal Code."
It is the validity of this order that is challenged in the present appeal.
3. Section 99-A under which the order was made, so far as relevant, is in these terms:
"Where any newspaper, or book ......or any document.....appears to the State Government to contain any seditious matter or any matter which promotes or is intende
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.