Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Judge Name, J
Sanjay Jain v. Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges compensation reduction following car accident. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding delay and total loss criteria. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. opposing counsel defends the delay justification in filing. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court reasoning emphasized the weight of surveyor's assessment. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. final decision confirmed compensation awarded with interest. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
1. This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner Sanjay Jain challenging the order dated 20.2.2015 passed in First Appeal No. 567 of 2014 by the Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (in short the State Commission).
2. Brief facts of the case are that the Petitioner is the registered owner of the car which was imported from Japan, bearing Registration No. HR - 06W - 0999 of MITSUBISHI - OUTLANDER - 2-4 - M - 1VEC and got it insured by the Respondent for a period of one year from 21.9.2010 till 20.9.2011. The vehicle was insured with the respondent opposite party for Rs.18,90,500. The said vehicle met with an accident on 27.3.2011 and was heavily damaged. Opposite party was informed immediately. As per the instruction of the Respondent
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
