Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Deepa Sharma (Presiding Member)
Tek Singh Arora v. Rajasthan Prasaran Nigam Ltd.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appeal centers on dismissing the complaint and unjust cost imposition. (Para 1 , 2 , 5) |
| 2. the court emphasized the restricted jurisdiction in appeals under the consumer protection act. (Para 3 , 6 , 11) |
| 3. no jurisdictional errors were found to disturb concurrent findings; cost was found unjust. (Para 10 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. the final ruling of partly allowing the petition and setting aside the cost. (Para 15) |
1. The present revision petition has been filed by the complainant challenging the order of the State Commission dated 6.2.2020 in Appeal No. 835 of 2018 whereby the order of the District Forum, dismissing his complaint, was confirmed and a cost of Rs.10,000 was imposed upon him.
2. It is argued that he is a complainant and fighting for his just right and imposition of cost was unjustified. It is submitted that the impugned order is arbitrary and is liable to be set aside.
3. It is argued by the respondent that the present revision petition has no merit. Findings of the Fora below are based on the evidences on record and this commission cannot re - appreciate and re - assess the evidence in exercise of its jurisdiction under S.21(b) of the Consumer Protection
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
