Back
DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
R. K. Agrawal, J
Manoj Kumar Sharma v. Supertech Ltd.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complainants allege deficiency in service for non-delivery of flats. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. complainants have standing due to continued failure to deliver possession. (Para 8 , 10) |
| 3. definition of consumer confirmed, as no commercial purpose established. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. jurisdiction established based on territorial and pecuniary grounds. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. deficiency of service acknowledged; compensation awarded with details on interest. (Para 20 , 24 , 25) |
1. The present complaint on being returned by the district Forum vide order dated 16.4.2018 has been filed by the complainants before this Commission under S.12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 alleging deficiency of services by the opposite party and has prayed as under:
(a) Restrain the O.P from demanding the alleged interest of Rs.3,54,066 (against Flat No. 1905) and Rs.3,45,655 (against Flat No. 1906) or any other amount as interest on the alleged non - payment of instalments allegedly w.e.f. June 2010.
(b) Direct the opposite party to issue Allotment letter and handover the possession of the said Flat Nos. F - 1905 and F - 1906 in Supertech Livingston situated at Crossing Republic, NH - 24, Ghazia
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
