Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
C. Viswanath (Presiding Member)
Indusland Bank Ltd. v. Abani Kanta Das
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consumer's vehicle was seized without proper notice. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. conflicting accounts on payments led to differing claims of ownership and control. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments revolve around legality and agreement terms regarding loan repayment. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. court stresses adherence to legal processes in seizure to avoid unfair practices. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. court upheld lower rulings; affirmed dismissal of the petition. (Para 11) |
1. The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioners against order dated 31.10.2011 of the West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short "State Commission") in FA.3.2011 wherein the Appeal filed by the Petitioners was dismissed.
2. Case of the Complainant is that the Complainant purchased a ten - wheeler truck of Ashok Leyland Ltd. bearing registration No. WB29/6162, chassis No. WDE - 545847, and engine No. DWE 406960 financed by OP No. 1 through OP No. 2. The Complainant entered into an agreement with OP No. 1 and accordingly OP Nos. 1 and 2 sanctioned a loan of Rs.9,15,000. As per the terms and conditions of the agreement, the Complainant deposited a sum of Rs.82,687 with Opposite Party Nos.1 an
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
