Back
DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Not mentioned, Not mentioned
Mr. Amit Khanna – Appellant
Versus
M/s. Pearl Infrastructure Projects Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim filed under consumer protection act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. opposite party failed to respond. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. court discussed jurisdictional issues. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. limitation period for consumer complaints. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. deficiency in service established. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. final compensation and orders issued. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
1. Present Consumer Complaint has been filed under S.17 of the Consumer Protection Act , 1986 by Mr. Amit Khanna (hereinafter referred to as "complainant") against M/s. Pearl Infrastructure Projects Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Opposite Party") seeking the following reliefs:
(a) Direct the opposite party to refund as sum of Rs.14,37,500 which was paid by the complainant along with interest @ 18% p.a. from the date of payment till the date of receipt.
(b) Pay to the complainant a sum of Rs.20,00,000 as compensation for deficiency of service, mental agony and pain suffered by him.
(c) Direct the opposite party to pay a sum of Rs.51,000 as litigation costs to the complainant.
(d) Such other and further order as this Hon'ble Commission deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case be a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
