Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
*Dr. S. M. Kantikar (Presiding Member), Dinesh Singh (Member)
K. M. Shrishti Puri v. All India Institute of Medical Sciences
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of complaint parties and procedures. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details on alleged medical negligence related to the patient's surgery. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. defense arguments regarding surgical actions and patient consent. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. discussion on medical practices and expected standards in surgery. (Para 12 , 14 , 18) |
| 5. court's rationale for dismissing the complaint based on evidence. (Para 19 , 22 , 25) |
| 6. conclusion and outcome of the case. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
1. This Complaint was filed by the Complainants against four Opposite Parties: Opposite Party No. 1 - AIIMS, New Delhi; Opposite Party No. 2 - Professor Dr. Arvind Jaiswal; Opposite Party No. 3 - Dr. Shashank Shekhar Kale; Opposite Party No. 4 - Dr. B.D. Chaudhary Arguments were heard in part on 12.12.2019. vide the Order dated 12.12.2019, for reasons recorded, the Opposite Party No. 4 - Dr. B.D. Chaudhary was deleted from the array of the parties. This was in accordance with the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the Complainants, confirmed by the Complainant No. 2 in person.
The said Order of 12.12.2019 was not put to review or challenge.
2. Arguments were then heard and concl
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
