Back
DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Unknown, J
Mr. Alok Arora and Ms. Seema Arora – Appellant
Versus
TDI Infrastructure Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishes jurisdiction and consumer status. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. contests against maintainability and necessity of proof. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. examines jurisdiction based on monetary claims. (Para 6 , 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. defines consumer identity against claims of commercial intent. (Para 9 , 11 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. determines deficiency of service and compensatory measures. (Para 18 , 20 , 22) |
| 6. final ruling states complaint is upheld. (Para 23 , 24 , 26) |
1. The present complaint has been filed before this commission under S.17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by Mr. Alok Arora and Ms. Seema Arora (hereinafter referred to as ˜complainants') against the TDI Infrastructure Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as ˜opposite party') seeking following reliefs:
(a) Direct the opposite party to repay principle amount of Rs. 48,75,000 (Rupees Forty Eight lacs Seventy Five thousand Only.
(b) Direct the opposite party to pay an amount of Rs. 51,29,359 (Rupees Fifty One Lac Twenty Nine Thousand Three Hundred Fifty Nine Only) on the account of interest @ 21 % per annum from the date of payment till the date of filing of the present complaint. Also direct the opposite party to pay penden tilite an
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
