SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Del) 7141

DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
string, ACJ
HDFC Bank Ltd. v. Sudesh Kumar


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: [names]
For the Respondents: [names]

1. The present appeal has been filed by the Appellants under S.15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 impugning the order dated 6.6.2013 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum - VI, ITO, New Delhi in Complaint No. 330 of 2005 filed by respondent No. 1 against the appellants and respondent No. 2.

2. The District Forum vide the impugned order dated 6.6.2013 allowed the relief as prayed by the respondent No. 1 and directed the appellants to pay the value of shares i.e. Rs.1,15,000 along with interest @ 9% per annum from 28.12.2004 till payment, a sum of Rs.50,000 as compensation for the deficiency & harassment and Rs.25,000 fro litigation expenses.

3. The District Forum, in its judgment dated 6.6.2013 has held as under:
"In our view, the fact that complainant is having the original instructions with him is most crucial & clinching to the controversy. It is obvious that once the original are with the complainant, it follows that something has happened at the end of OP - 1, leading to transfer of shares. Its employees etc. have obviously printed two sets of instruction book, which has been used for transaction in the name of complainant. The police has to direct investigat






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top