DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
string, ACJ
HDFC Bank Ltd. v. Sudesh Kumar
1. The present appeal has been filed by the Appellants under S.15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 impugning the order dated 6.6.2013 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum - VI, ITO, New Delhi in Complaint No. 330 of 2005 filed by respondent No. 1 against the appellants and respondent No. 2.
2. The District Forum vide the impugned order dated 6.6.2013 allowed the relief as prayed by the respondent No. 1 and directed the appellants to pay the value of shares i.e. Rs.1,15,000 along with interest @ 9% per annum from 28.12.2004 till payment, a sum of Rs.50,000 as compensation for the deficiency & harassment and Rs.25,000 fro litigation expenses.
3. The District Forum, in its judgment dated 6.6.2013 has held as under:
"In our view, the fact that complainant is having the original instructions with him is most crucial & clinching to the controversy. It is obvious that once the original are with the complainant, it follows that something has happened at the end of OP - 1, leading to transfer of shares. Its employees etc. have obviously printed two sets of instruction book, which has been used for transaction in the name of complainant. The police has to direct investigat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.