Back
DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Not Mentioned, Not Mentioned
Manisha Gosain v. Ocus Skyscrapers Realty Ltd.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts regarding booking and payments made for commercial unit. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. debate on whether the purchase was for commercial purpose. (Para 10 , 15) |
| 3. discussion about licenses and available permissions for construction. (Para 19 , 22) |
| 4. final ruling on the sufficiency of evidence and complaint outcome. (Para 24) |
1. Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of the present complaint are that in February, 2013 the complainant booked a commercial space in the Opposite Party's project "OCUS 24K" located at Sohna Road, Sector 68, Gurgaon, Haryana. The Complainant paid a registration amount of Rs.4,00,000 vide cheque bearing No. 209331 to the Opposite Party.
2. Vide letter dated 28.5.2013, the Opposite Party provisionally allotted Unit No. UG - 186 admeasuring 361 sq.ft. on the upper ground floor of the Opposite party's project.
3. Subsequently, on 27.6.2013, the complainant made further payment to the extent of Rs.7,17,542 vide cheque No. 084713 to the Opposite Party. The Complainant had paid a total amount of Rs.11,17,542 even before execution of the Builder Buyer Agreement.
4. Pursuant to this, the Buyer's Agreement was executed between the parties on 24.12.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
