Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
J.D. Khanchandani, J
Manish Vashishth v. Huda
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the complaint against huda regarding plot possession and amenities. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. huda's challenge to the district forum's order. (Para 4 , 8) |
| 3. the court's recognition of the need for alternative allotments due to policy and litigation. (Para 10 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. the decision allowing the miscellaneous application and stating the legal basis for alternative plots. (Para 15) |
1. The Revision Petition No. 2046 of 2011, under S.21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short the Act), was preferred by the Petitioners / Complainants, against the Order dated 17.1.2011, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana, Panchkula (for short the State Commission) in First Appeal No. 1418/2005 whereby the State Commission had allowed the Appeal filed by the Respondents, Haryana Urban Development Authority (for short, the HUDA) and set aside the order dated 6.6.2005 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Faridabad (for short the District Forum).
2. Succinctly put, the material facts relevant for disposal of the Miscellaneous Application No. 239 of 2020 and I. A. No. 58 of 2021 are that on 8.3.1973, the HUDA had al
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
