SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(Del) 4511

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
J.D. Khanchandani, J
Manish Vashishth v. Huda


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sh. Nitin Kumar
For the Respondents: -

1. The Revision Petition No. 2046 of 2011, under S.21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short the Act), was preferred by the Petitioners / Complainants, against the Order dated 17.1.2011, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana, Panchkula (for short the State Commission) in First Appeal No. 1418/2005 whereby the State Commission had allowed the Appeal filed by the Respondents, Haryana Urban Development Authority (for short, the HUDA) and set aside the order dated 6.6.2005 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Faridabad (for short the District Forum).

2. Succinctly put, the material facts relevant for disposal of the Miscellaneous Application No. 239 of 2020 and I. A. No. 58 of 2021 are that on 8.3.1973, the HUDA had allotted a residential unit being Plot No. 619 admeasuring 500 sq. yards in Sector 21 - B, Faridabad to one, Mrs. Parkash Kumar for a tentative price of 22,000. On death of the original allottee, the Plot was transferred in the name of her husband, Raj Kumar on 21.12.2003. Subsequently, the Plot was transferred by the HUDA in the name of the Complainants on 19.4.2005 vide Sale Deed No. 769. It is alleged tha







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top