Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
N/A, N/A
Dr. (Mrs.) Mridula Rajbanshi and Ms. Suvriti Rajbanshi – Appellant
Versus
UMANG Realtech Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complaint filed for delayed possession under consumer protection act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. opposite party claimed delay due to force majeure. (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. possession delayed beyond agreed period. (Para 4 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. consumer's right to seek compensation for delays. (Para 7 , 13) |
| 5. builder directed to refund with interest. (Para 14) |
1. The present Consumer Complaint has been filed by Dr. (Mrs.) Mridula Rajbanshi and Ms. Suvriti Rajbanshi (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Complainants") under S.21(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act") against UMANG Realtech Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Opposite Party / Builder Co.") for failure to hand over possession of their booked apartment by the stipulated date as agreed in the Apartment Buyers' Agreement.
2. Brief facts are that on 25.03.2006, the Complainants had booked a 3 - BHK residential apartment admeasuring approximately 1653 sq. ft. with UMANG Realtech Pvt. Ltd. (Opposite Party) in its upcoming residential complex 'WINTER HILLS DWARKA, New Delhi'. The total sale consideration for the said apartment was Rs.91,50,218. However, the total basic sale
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
