Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
R. K. Agrawal (President)
Veena Gupta v. DLF Universal Limited
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initiation of a consumer complaint based on contract terms. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. issues regarding the validity of delays claimed by the developer. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. developer's defense about consumer status and arbitration terms. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
1. The present Consumer Complaint has been filed by the Complainant under S.21(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short "the Act") against the Opposite Party, M/s. DLF Universal Limited (hereinafter to be referred to as "the Developer") seeking vacant physical possession of the booked Apartment and compensation on account of delay in handing over the possession.
2. It has been, inter alia, averred in the Complaint that in the year 2010, the Developer launched a Group Housing Project, namely, "DLF Capital Greens", to be constructed on a land admeasuring approximately 31.15 acres situated at DLF Capital Greens - Phase III at 15, ShivajiMarg, New Delhi - 110015.
3. Swayed with the impressive publicity by the Developer in the Media and the assurances given by them, the Complainant booked an Apartment in the above said Project of the Developer on 30thNovember, 2010 and paid the registration
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
