Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
* R. K. Agrawal (President), Dr. S. M. Kantikar (Member)
Nidhi Gupta and Mala Gupta – Appellant
Versus
M/s. Parsvnath Developers Limited and Dr. Sunit Sachar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consumer complaint based on dissatisfaction due to possession delay. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding unfair terms and construction delays. (Para 8 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court's emphasis on contractual fairness and possession timelines. (Para 10 , 14 , 19) |
| 4. rulings on the validity of contract terms enforced for property possession. (Para 16 , 20) |
| 5. final order for refund due to unreasonable delays in possession. (Para 21 , 22) |
1. The present Consumer Complaint has been filed under S.21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short "the Act") by Nidhi Gupta and Mala Gupta (hereinafter referred to as the Complainants) against Opposite Party No. 1, M/s. Parsvnath Developers Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Developer) and Opposite Party No. 2 - Dr. Sunit Sachar, Vice President of the Opposite Party No. 1, seeking refund of the amount paid towards purchase of Flat along with interest and costs as the Opposite Party Developer had failed to hand - over the possession of the Flat booked by them in the Project launched by the Developer in the name and style of "Parsvnath Exotica" located at S.53, Golf Course Road, Gurgaon.
2. Brief facts as narrated in th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
