Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
A M Khanwilkar, J, N V Ramana, CJ
Premlal Halwai v. Vishal Motors
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations about vehicle defects and ownership. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. court's evaluation of evidence regarding defects and repossession rights. (Para 10 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. arguments regarding vehicle age and repossession legality. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. court affirmed legal basis for repossession due to loan default. (Para 17) |
| 5. final outcome of the revision petition. (Para 18) |
1. Delay condoned
2. The present Revision Petition under S.21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short "the Act"), has been preferred by the Petitioner / Complainant questioning the correctness and legality of the impugned Order dated 5.7.2016, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chhattisgarh (for short "the State Commission") in First Appeal No. 71 of 2015. By the Impugned Order, the State Commission has dismissed the First Appeal filed by the Complainant and upheld the Order dated 4.11.2010 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh (for short, the "District Forum") dismissing his Complaint.
3. Succinctly put, the material facts leading to filing of the Complaint are that the Complainant had purchased a Bajaj
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
