NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
A M Khanwilkar, J, N V Ramana, CJ
Premlal Halwai v. Vishal Motors
1. Delay condoned
2. The present Revision Petition under S.21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short "the Act"), has been preferred by the Petitioner / Complainant questioning the correctness and legality of the impugned Order dated 5.7.2016, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chhattisgarh (for short "the State Commission") in First Appeal No. 71 of 2015. By the Impugned Order, the State Commission has dismissed the First Appeal filed by the Complainant and upheld the Order dated 4.11.2010 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh (for short, the "District Forum") dismissing his Complaint.
3. Succinctly put, the material facts leading to filing of the Complaint are that the Complainant had purchased a Bajaj Tempo Excel 2 Pick Up Van on 19.4.2004 from the Respondent No. 1, namely, Vishal Motors (hereinafter to be referred to as the "Dealer"), the Dealer of the Respondent No. 2, Bajaj Tempo Ltd., the Manufacturer (hereinafter referred to be as the "Manufacturer") for a sum of Rs.3,80,000. He paid a sum of 87,000 in cash to the Dealer and rest of the amount was got financed from the Respondent No. 3, HDFC

Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.