Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Shri P. S. Sethi, S.J.
Vinod Kumar Chopra and Ritu Chopra – Appellant
Versus
M/s. Ireo Grace Realtech Private Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. delayed possession of booked flats. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claim for refund due to delays. (Para 3) |
| 3. unfair terms in buyers' agreement. (Para 10) |
| 4. mandated refund with interest. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
1. The present Consumer Complaint has been filed under S.21(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short "the Act") by the Complainants, against the Opposite Party M/s. Ireo Grace Realtech Private Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the 'Developer'), for refunding of money as the Opposite Party Developer failed to hand - over the possession of the Flat booked by them in the Project launched by the Developer in the name and style "The Corridor ", within stipulated period.
2. According to the Complainants, the facts of the case are that the Opposite Party Developer launched a Residential Housing Project in the name and style of "The Corridors" (hereinafter referred to as the 'Project') located at Golf Course Extension Road, Sector - 67 - A, Tehsil & District Gurgaon, Haryana. The Opposite Party Developer drawn very rosy picture of the Project and represented that it would be a unique project with world class amenities and assured timely delivery and lots more. Attracted
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
