Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
R.K. Agrawal, CJ, Mrs. S. Malhotra, Member
Dr. Vijay Purushottam Kale, Dr. Purushottam Gopalrao Kale, Dr. Satishchandra Purushottam Kale – Appellant
Versus
M/s. Hetali Enterprises, Builders & Developers – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complainants filing for compensation due to delayed possession and area discrepancies. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. opponents coercively influenced possession timelines and finances. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 18) |
| 3. opposing parties argued charges and legal obligations determining consumer rights. (Para 9 , 10 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. court's observations on the obligations of builders and validity of sums charged. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. final outcome based on consumer rights and compensation standards. (Para 19 , 20 , 22 , 23) |
1. These three Consumer Complaints have been filed by Dr. Vijay Purushottam Kale, Dr. Purushottam Gopalrao Kale and Dr. Satishchandra Purushottam Kale (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Complainants") under S.21(a) (i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short "the Act") against M/s. Hetali Enterprises, Builders & Developers (Opposite Party No. 1) and Andheri Nav Bahar CHS (Opposite Party No. 2 / the Society) at Vile Parle, seeking compensation towards the alleged deficiency, unfair trade practice and delayed possession of their flats under redevelopment plan.
2. Since the facts of the cases and the Opposite Parties are same, these Complaints are
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
