NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
P.K. Sinha, J
Rakesh Jhamb v. Wave Megacity Centre Pvt. Ltd.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the complainant's transaction with the builder. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding compliance and delays. (Para 4 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. court's observations on construction delays and possession issues. (Para 5 , 7) |
1. Heard Ms. Sumati Sharma, Advocate, for the complainant and Mr. Sumeer Sodhi,Advocate, for the opposite party.
2. Aforementioned complaint has been filed for directing the opposite party, (here in after referred to as the builder) (i) to return the money paid by the complainant, amounting to Rs.72,05,512 along with interest @18% per annum, (ii) to cancel "Allottee Arrangement Agreement" dated 26.10.2012, (iii) to pay Rs.50 lacs as compensation for mental agony and physical harassment (iv) to pay Rs.2 lacs as cost of the litigation and (v) any other relief which may be deemed fit and proper, in the facts of the case, be passed.
3. The facts, as stated in the complaint and emerged from the documents attached with it, are that the builder was a company, engaged in the business of development and construction of residential and commercial buildings and selling its unit to the prospective buyers. In the year 2011, the builder propaga
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.