Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Member, J
Narinder Sachdeva v. Ansal Housing And Construction Ltd.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complaint filed under consumer protection act regarding non-delivery of possession. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding hardship caused by developer's failures. (Para 4 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. court's observations on the applicability of legal principles to the circumstances. (Para 5 , 7 , 10) |
| 4. court's reasoning against the developer’s claims of force majeure. (Para 9) |
| 5. final decision awarding refund and costs to the complainants. (Para 13 , 14) |
1. The present Consumer Complaint has been filed Under S.21 read with S.12(1)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act , 1986 (for short "the Act") by the Complainants against the Opposite Party, M/s. Ansal Housing & Construction Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Developer") seeking refund of 82,89,574 paid by the Complainants towards purchase of the Residential Apartment in the Project of the Developer, i.e. "Ansal Highland Park", along with interest and costs as the Developer has miserably failed to hand over the possession of the booked Apartment within the prescribed time.
2. The facts leading upto the present Complaint are that on 6.12.2012, the Complainants had booked a Residential Apartment in the Group Housing Proje
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
