Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Judge, J
Mr. Vikas Mittal – Appellant
Versus
M/s. DLF Universal Limited and Another – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts detailing the complaint of delay in possession. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments addressing the complainant's claims and op's objections. (Para 9 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court observations on jurisdiction and applicability of consumer law. (Para 13 , 15 , 17) |
| 4. reasoning regarding the entitlement for delayed possession compensation. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 5. final decision on the complaint's outcome. (Para 22) |
1. The present Consumer Complaint has been filed under S.21(a) (i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short "the Act") by Mr. Vikas Mittal (hereinafter referred to as the Complainant) against the Opposite Parties, M/s. DLF Universal Limited and Another (hereinafter referred to as the Opposite Parties) seeking delay compensation @ 12% per annum for delay in delivery of possession of the Apartment.
2. The brief facts leading upto the present Complaint are that the Complainant booked an Apartment (hereinafter referred to as the Unit) in the Project of the Opposite Party "DLF Capital Greens" situated at phase - II, Shivaji Marg, New Delhi. The Complainant paid Rs.7,50,000 as the booking amount as per application from dated 29.9.2009 and thereafter he was allo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
