Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
R. K. Agrawal (President), Dr. S. M. Kantikar (Member)
Chanda Manghani, Rahul Manghani – Appellant
Versus
M/s. Raheja Developers Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consumer complaint filed for failure to deliver possession. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. developer's defense regarding the consumer definition and terms of the agreement. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court discusses the one-sided nature of the contract and its implications. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 4. entitlement of complainants to refund and compensation for delay in possession. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. final decision allowing the consumer complaint. (Para 18 , 19) |
1. The present Consumer Complaint has been filed under S.21(A)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short "the Act") by Chanda Manghani and Rahul Manghani (hereinafter referred to as the Complainants) against Opposite Party, M/s. Raheja Developers Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Developer), seeking refund of the amount paid towards purchase of Flat along with interest as the Opposite Party Developer failed to hand - over the possession of the Flat booked by them in the Project launched by the Developer in the name and style of "Raheja Revanta" located at Sector 78, Gurugram, Haryana.
2. Brief facts as narrated in the Complaint are that the Opposite Party Developer launched a Residential Housing Project in the name and style o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
