Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
V.K. Jain, J
Rajkumar – Appellant
Versus
Dr. Rajeev Jain – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petition is rooted in a consumer complaint regarding alleged medical negligence. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. the court noted insufficient evidence to prove negligence in the doctor's treatment. (Para 5 , 12) |
| 3. the treatment was found to be in accordance with accepted medical practices. (Para 9 , 11) |
| 4. the revision petition was dismissed with no error detected in prior judgments. (Para 13) |
1. This Revision Petition is filed by the Petitioner / Complainant under S.21 of the Consumer Protection Act , 1986 against the Order dated 19/12/2019 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, U.P. (hereinafter referred to as the 'State Commission'), which allowed the Appeal and set aside the Order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum (hereinafter referred to as the 'District Forum') and consequently dismissed the Complaint.
2. Briefly stated the facts are that on 10/04/2010, the Complainant Rajkumar injured his left leg in the road accident. He was examined and was treated by an Orthopedician, Dr. Rajeev Jain (hereinafter referred to as the 'Opposite Party No. 1') at Dr. Narender Memorial Murti Nursing Home at Baraut and then he was operated on 17/04/2010.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
