Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
N/A, N/A
Ghanshyam Purswani v. Angle Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and claim. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. respondent's objections to the complaint. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 17) |
| 3. court's discussion on jurisdiction and delay. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 16 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. court's reasoning and ratio decidendi. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 24) |
| 5. final verdict and directions issued. (Para 25) |
1. The present Consumer Complaint has been filed under S.21(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act , 1986 (for short the Act) against the Opposite Party, M/s Angel Infrastructure Private Limited (hereinafter to be referred as the Opposite Party) seeking refund of Rs. 1,01,98,243 (Rupees One Crore One Lakh Ninety Eight Thousand Two Hundred and Forty Three Only), which was paid by the Complainant against the total consideration of the flat booked along with interest.
2. The brief facts as set out in the Complaint are that the Complainant booked a residential unit in a Project of Opposite Party namely FLORENCE ESTATE which the Opposite Party was to develop in Sector 70, Gurugram, Haryana, Unit No. B - 1404, Tower - B, 13th Floor with an area admeasuring 2,125 sq. ft., Unit Type - Apartment 3BHK+Study and which was allotted to him for a tot
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
